Normally I
wouldn’t do this, but I warned you, I would voice my opinion.
This is one of those times.
Someone recently
reviewed one of our books. Now, while I'm not opposed to someone reviewing our
work, I am opposed to having it dissected, and examined under a
microscope.
It’s my
understanding that a story is just that - a story. It’s not a lesson,
and it’s not a lecture. It’s supposed to be entertaining, suspenseful and maybe
have a moral.
As an author,
I believe we should exercise a certain amount of ‘courtesy’
and ‘etiquette’ when ‘reviewing’ other authors works. No matter what other people
might think of our stories and novels, to us, they are our ‘babies’ and should
be treated as such. Who has the right to label anyone's story as
good or bad? You might like it, whereas I may not. It's opinion based on
preference. Take into account:
I see the Sun
as warm, inviting, glowing and alive. It gives warmth; it promotes growth
and has essence. My husband sees it
as the star nearest to the Earth. It gives light and
warmth, but it also means hard, unpleasant radiation,
which can cause sunburn and skin cancer.
I see a
puppy as cute, warm, cuddly, and a source of unconditional friendship and
love. My husband sees it as furry, bouncy, energetic, sleepy and
chewy, a kid-magnet, and a pooping pee factory. “It has nothing
to do with toilet rolls - sorry Andrex.”
Am I making sense
yet? I’m not saying this person is wrong, but I believe they
could have been a bit more tactful about their views. I am not an
expert. I did not go to college and obtain a language
degree. I most certainly would consider myself as a professional. Maybe author
does fit me. Let’s talk turkey here.
According to
Wikipedia, an author is broadly defined as: the person who
originates or gives existence to anything. Narrowly defined, an
author is the originator of any written work. [emphasis
added]
According to
Merriam Webster - apart from the above example, an author is: the
writer of a literary work. (book)
According to
Oxford English Dictionary - an author is: a writer of a book,
article, or document.
Well, let's
see... do I qualify? According to the above examples - yes - I do. I have
written stories, songs, poems, screenplays, plays, web pages, and am now
working on my seventh book. Hmm... I’d say I've fulfilled the requirements –
wouldn’t you? Now, do I qualify as a good author? Some
would say I do. Should I consider myself as a bad author? Who knows -
maybe?
My point - does
it really matter? No matter how good or bad of an author you are, there will
always be someone who disagrees. To be an author does not mean
everybody out there will always understand
or enjoy your work. If that was the case, then the World
would need only one book. But, what book would this
be, and who would decide? Some people want to learn, while
others want to escape. Who’s right, and who’s wrong?
If I help someone
to see things from a different point of view; I've done my job.
If I help someone
to realise a dream; I’ve done my job.
If I make someone
scratch their heads and think; I’ve done my job.
If my book or
story allows the ‘my husband is cheating on me’, ‘my parents don’t understand
me’, ‘why bother – there’s no use’, ‘my boss is driving me nuts’ person to
forget their problems, even for a little while; I've done my job!
Now... What do I
like? Easy - everything - but seriously....
I like
futuristic, science fiction, fantasy, mystery, suspense,
humor, romance and yes, maybe even a little sex. (Doesn't everybody?)
My husband likes
technical manuals, murder, science fiction, thrillers, mystery, and adventure.
My best friend
likes all of these, as long as there are no snakes involved. But that’s ok, I
don't like spiders.
Something that
bothers me is this. Because my books do not fall under the ‘known’ book
categories, when I put them on Amazon,
it's difficult to decide what category
to put them under. My books have a little of all of these. It
has murder, mystery, futuristic possibilities, science - pure
and fiction. Romance with a hint of sex in most. All of these are sprinkled
with a hefty measure of humor.
Why? Because
in real life, that's what humans are like. I want my characters to be
alive and realistic too. Yes, I’ll admit, I put a lot of ‘me’ in them
at times. And yes, to some, I might go overboard. If you feel that way, that's
your opinion, and you're entitled to it as much as I am to mine.
When I first
started considered my books for publication, I did, what I would expect
every newcomer does. I tried to learn everything about how to write,
and how to phrase things properly, and how not to do
something. I found myself pulling my hair out one strand at a
time. One person said do, the other said don't.
Then I came
across one that said it all... ‘Be yourself.’ Don’t try
to conform to somebody else’s norm. You are
your norm. You know what you want your books and stories to be
like. That’s what makes you an individual. That’s what makes you
unique. That is what's important!
I know you
probably think this is all useless rambling, and maybe it is? Does it matter?
In one word – no!
Life is about
individuality. It’s about growth and understanding. It’s about sharing and
caring. Mostly, it’s about me letting you be you, and you letting me
be me. Together we are variety.
Does
everyone like chocolate cake? No. Does
everyone like chocolate? Maybe.
Does
everyone like to read? Maybe not. Does everyone like stories?
Yes – even if it’s an audio book or a TV show.
My advice to you,
if you’re on my blog, and you don’t like reading… you’re in the wrong place.
Like it or not, I consider myself an author and I like to write. If I don’t
write something every day – I don’t feel as if I’ve accomplished anything.
Do I plan out my
stories? Not always. Most of the time they write themselves. They evolve as I
type. If you disagree - think of this as my way of venting.
Oops - rambling
again. Oh - wait. This blog is called Ramblings. Silly me - I thought I’d
stepped out of the norm.
Call me stupid. It doesn't bother me. Call me dumb. I can handle that. Call me normal? Now I'm insulted!